That is not an issue there’s not much to go wrong according to form.Looking for a 6-11 year old EV to try an avoid paying £165 a year? You might find possible repair costs of an older car may make that £165 VED look like a picnic.
Les.
That is not an issue there’s not much to go wrong according to form.Looking for a 6-11 year old EV to try an avoid paying £165 a year? You might find possible repair costs of an older car may make that £165 VED look like a picnic.
Good luck ?That is not an issue there’s not much to go wrong according to form.
Les.
No £165 a year tax x2 in my case, is not a-make or break for me not at all, and I agree with what you said about us paying out a lot more money to purchaseIf £165 a year tax is make or break for some people that's surprising as shelling out for an ev in the first place is that much more expensive than an ice. I agree completely with paying the VED.
I think if people genuinely believed that as more and more EV's came onto the road to replace ice cars and government revenue drops that they weren't going to do this were being a bit naive. Also to be fair why should we not pay
In 2022 there are 205k EVs registered in the UK. Once we start paying £165 road tax that will provide income of nearly £34m.also you say £165 not bad to use the roads, it will be very interesting to see how much the roads improve with this extra revenue from taxing EVs you also mention Fags/booze in your post so if a heftier tax was placed on them how many millions could that save by the NHS but it would be bad policy to do that with an election coming round of course.
lol if you listen to that licence payed, propaganda warrior, there is no hopeAs for lacing my tread with children and there children the longer we keep on burning fossil fuels the sooner this planet comes to an end listen to the scientists a man of 96 Sir David Attenborough as no reason to feed us bullsh*t.
I didn't think it was nice to see.Nice to see this topic has gone off track
'Massive increases in taxes' on the types of vehicles which you most likely owned for years and years and years and years and years and years and years, but didn't pay massive taxes on? So someone who can't afford an EV, even if they wanted one, should pay 'massive increase in taxes', of the sort of which you didn't pay for half a century (as, like now, they were just 'regularly taxed'), on the car which they use to go to work and keep society ticking over.If they governments of the UK and the world really and truly wanted to help the environment they could have kept up the incentives to go electric in transport and homes, and made massive increases in taxes on ice vehicles and their fuels but they won’t do that it’s far to close to a general election and you can bet lots of meal tickets for some.
The thing is, 'incentives' are handouts from tax payers' money pot, and the tax payer may well think now IS the right time.I stand by what I wrote in #184 what happen on Thursday was not unexpected we all knew it would happen at some point but now is not the right time.
It isn’t tax payer’s money any more, they get no say in how it is spent. In reality it is controlled by a handful of people in government and officialdom.The thing is, 'incentives' are handouts from tax payers' money pot, and the tax payer may well think now IS the right time.
Where do they (the Gov't) get 'their' money from? It don't fall from the sky.It isn’t tax payer’s money any more, they get no say in how it is spent. In reality it is controlled by a handful of people in government and officialdom.
It comes from tax payers, but after that I don’t think it is helpful to pretend we have any say.Where do they (the Gov't) get thier money from? It don't fall from the sky.
True, but the key words are it comes from tax payers.It comes from tax payers, but after that I don’t think it is helpful to pretend we have any say.
Aren't we all tax payers?The thing is, 'incentives' are handouts from tax payers' money pot, and the tax payer may well think now IS the right time.
I'm sure there would be lots of things in life I'd love to keep if someone else was paying for them for me.
?I was being ironicI didn't think it was nice to see.
So was I ??I was being ironic
Yes, and hence all should have a voice (technically they do at the ballot box). So you could look at it as EV tax paying/former tax paying owners of the very recent past had their tax payer grant to help to buy the car; had a tax payer grant to pay most of their home charger and installation; had free electricity in a number of places when out and about; had a good scrappage scheme; had free/no car tax.Aren't we all tax payers?
Yes, and hence all should have a voice (technically they do at the ballot box)Yes, and hence all should have a voice (technically they do at the ballot box). So you could look at it as EV tax paying/former tax paying owners of the very recent past had their tax payer grant to help to buy the car; had a tax payer grant to pay most of their home charger and installation; had free electricity in a number of places when out and about; had a good scrappage scheme; had free/no car tax.
So maybe now time for non EV tax payers/former tax payers to have their turn, and not continue to subsidise them.
A lot of the tone of the thread seems to be some EV owners don't like paying out their pocket anymore for stuff which used to be free. Understandable, but a bit tuff luck .
After using all sorts of rhetoric about saving planets, children and their children, Saint David, and all sorts of recommendations of tax payer incentives, agreedSo can we now put an end to all this political crap