- Joined
- Oct 29, 2023
- Messages
- 77
- Reaction score
- 74
- Points
- 27
- Location
- Christchurch, NZ
- Driving
- MG4 SE SR
I have the 51kWh version, and I came to the conclusion to not use ACC when I try to achieve high efficiency. The PID on the MG4 cruise control is absolutely rubbish. What I mean, it is making very aggressive deceleration and acceleration, regardless what distance/sensitivity you set. As someone already mentioned above, that is not good for efficiency. It is not so obvious on longer trips, but my daily commute (about 15km one way) is a good example. Using ACC as much I can gives me a 13.5 kWh/100km consumption. Without ACC, same route, same conditions only 9.9kWh/100km.
Regeneration is set to A, as that is the most economical setting in my opinion.
I decided to get the smallest battery, because I'm using the car mainly in town, short trips. It is 100kg lighter than the 64kWh version. Having a slight inconvenience on longer trips, isn't an issue for me.
Regeneration is set to A, as that is the most economical setting in my opinion.
I decided to get the smallest battery, because I'm using the car mainly in town, short trips. It is 100kg lighter than the 64kWh version. Having a slight inconvenience on longer trips, isn't an issue for me.