Thing is though, the topic thread seems to have gotten some very irate and overly emotional at the cessation of freebies. Probably why it drifted!Children please get back on topic ,
EV’s to pay VED ! Not bloody every thing else
Thing is though, the topic thread seems to have gotten some very irate and overly emotional at the cessation of freebies. Probably why it drifted!Children please get back on topic ,
EV’s to pay VED ! Not bloody every thing else
Agreed, EVs should pay VED and this should steer back onto topic of the changes announced in the Autumn Statement.Children please get back on topic ,
EV’s to pay VED ! Not bloody every thing else
the hole is likely to be around £1400 per vehicle, per year (the maths and thinking here from earlier in the thread) - so as EV drivers I beliieve it would be foolhardy of us to expect that the government will stop at VED .....
You may well be correct but that's likely to impact some harder than others.I think an initial step will be some form of tax added to the already quite expensive public charging costs
Yes, we will and why shouldn't they? When fuel duty brings in around £30 billion in taxes per year, if the demand goes down, the tax take goes down and thus it has to be found from other places.The reality of the situation is that overall we will be paying more tax in the future than currently and Government will not be able to resist taxing EVs.
There's no doubt about it. It would see what is already a two tier system of those who home charge overnight for peanuts, vs those who have to charge exclusively in public at a cost somewhere in the region of ten times higher, exacerbated.You may well be correct but that's likely to impact some harder than others.
And maybe a third tier- those who celebrated the end of free public charging, when Joe depending on them as he don't have a home charger and is struggling with his energy bills, and the free charging was a slight ray in a dimming financial situation. What was great for those who celebrated the coffin nail of free public charging, who probably got their home charger and probably got enough coin to pay public when they need to, might not be so great for Joe.There's no doubt about it. It would see what is already a two tier system of those who home charge overnight for peanuts, vs those who have to charge exclusively in public at a cost somewhere in the region of ten times higher, exacerbated.
Here in France our Mayor does exactly that - it's not exacty free to all, you need to be registered and have an RFID card, and they don't explain how to do that - you either know (local) or you don't; but it's free and mainly generated by renewables (we have many, many solar panels and live in a quite sunny part of the world) so the overall cost to us all in our taxes is negligible and it saves us hundreds, if not thousands of euros per year.If my local authority was giving away charging to all and sundry I'd be protesting vigorously even though I could conceivably make use of it.
John, you write really well, would you be willing to summarise the differences with the EV culture/practicalities in France? Maybe not appropriate for this thread, I don’t know, but I’d like to understand how things are different over there.Here in France our Mayor does exactly that - it's not exacty free to all, you need to be registered and have an RFID card, and they don't explain how to do that - you either know (local) or you don't; but it's free and mainly generated by renewables (we have many, many solar panels and live in a quite sunny part of the world) so the overall cost to us all in our taxes is negligible and it saves us hundreds, if not thousands of euros per year.
BUT ..... while it's great, we'd be foolish to think such facilities will last forever - as with no VED in the UK, they are an incentive (hence why we have to register, after a while the town hall will start to charge for its use), so while the electrons are free we'll use them and be very grateful, but once they move to a charging structure we'll accept that we did well at the time and move back to charging at home without complaint.
I remember back in the day the UK gov't drove a change to diesel cars - the experts said they were better for the planet as they used less resources - by lowering fuel duty on diesel (as did the French). Then (I think it was) Gordon Brown during his Chancellor stints realised just how many diesel cars had been sold, worked out how much he was losing in revenue, ('cos they visited the pumps less than the same car with a petrol engine and fuel duty was lower) and promptly slapped a huge hike on diesel (I think it was around 10p per liter?). Then the same experts who told us they were good for the planet decided they were the choice of the devil and people (like Jacob Rees Mogg I guess?) who stuffed children up chimneys for financial gain, and taxed them again, this time via the VED system.
The reason I mention the diesel thing? Each time a technology comes along that one government's experts feel needs pushing for them to meet an agenda, whatever said agenda may be, financial incentives are offered to 'drive' (pardon the pun) the public towards taking up that technology (for instance, there is currently 0% VAT on solar and batteries in the UK (wish we had the same deal here in France!) as it's in the government's interest for people to install solar and battery storage as it helps towards their 'net zero' status). After a while, those incentives are slowly removed - either to reduce the spend on the incentives or to raise tax that is being lost in other areas by the take up of said technologies, we've seen it before, we're starting to see it now with the EVs and we'll see it again with something else; it's just the way things are and we should be looking at this with the "oh well, at least I benefitted for a while from it" mindset rather than "these crooks** are taking away all the free stuff I've been getting" .
** For reasons of balance, I have to point out that I am in no way describing the current UK government as "crooks" by this statement (despite the fact that they most obviously are all as bent as a nine-bob note)![]()
Nicely written, shame you had to throw political bias and potentially libelous insults in.Here in France our Mayor does exactly that - it's not exacty free to all, you need to be registered and have an RFID card, and they don't explain how to do that - you either know (local) or you don't; but it's free and mainly generated by renewables (we have many, many solar panels and live in a quite sunny part of the world) so the overall cost to us all in our taxes is negligible and it saves us hundreds, if not thousands of euros per year.
BUT ..... while it's great, we'd be foolish to think such facilities will last forever - as with no VED in the UK, they are an incentive (hence why we have to register, after a while the town hall will start to charge for its use), so while the electrons are free we'll use them and be very grateful, but once they move to a charging structure we'll accept that we did well at the time and move back to charging at home without complaint.
I remember back in the day the UK gov't drove a change to diesel cars - the experts said they were better for the planet as they used less resources - by lowering fuel duty on diesel (as did the French). Then (I think it was) Gordon Brown during his Chancellor stints realised just how many diesel cars had been sold, worked out how much he was losing in revenue, ('cos they visited the pumps less than the same car with a petrol engine and fuel duty was lower) and promptly slapped a huge hike on diesel (I think it was around 10p per liter?). Then the same experts who told us they were good for the planet decided they were the choice of the devil and people (like Jacob Rees Mogg I guess?) who stuffed children up chimneys for financial gain, and taxed them again, this time via the VED system.
The reason I mention the diesel thing? Each time a technology comes along that one government's experts feel needs pushing for them to meet an agenda, whatever said agenda may be, financial incentives are offered to 'drive' (pardon the pun) the public towards taking up that technology (for instance, there is currently 0% VAT on solar and batteries in the UK (wish we had the same deal here in France!) as it's in the government's interest for people to install solar and battery storage as it helps towards their 'net zero' status). After a while, those incentives are slowly removed - either to reduce the spend on the incentives or to raise tax that is being lost in other areas by the take up of said technologies, we've seen it before, we're starting to see it now with the EVs and we'll see it again with something else; it's just the way things are and we should be looking at this with the "oh well, at least I benefitted for a while from it" mindset rather than "these crooks** are taking away all the free stuff I've been getting" .
** For reasons of balance, I have to point out that I am in no way describing the current UK government as "crooks" by this statement (despite the fact that they most obviously are all as bent as a nine-bob note)![]()
Where's the fun if one doesn't? (and there's no political bias there, I'm a lifelong Conservative voter just for the record)Nicely written, shame you had to throw political bias and potentially libelous insults in.
?Nicely written, shame you had to throw political bias and potentially libelous insults in.
Sure - not for this thread but if you want to kick something off in a new thread I can happily contribute; there are other French-based users here too who would I'm sure be able to add in useful info.John, you write really well, would you be willing to summarise the differences with the EV culture/practicalities in France? Maybe not appropriate for this thread, I don’t know, but I’d like to understand how things are different over there.
Done, new thread is here:Sure - not for this thread but if you want to kick something off in a new thread I can happily contribute; there are other French-based users here too who would I'm sure be able to add in useful info.
Not to kick off any sort of argument again, but I am genuinely interested what your issue is with "I.C.E.". you appear to have mentioned it a few times. At the risk of sounding condescending, you do understand it stands for 'Internal Combustion Engine', so I don't see why you seem to reference the term as you do....... in their what are amusingly now called 'ICE' cars, ......
Proper cars?Not to kick off any sort of argument again, but I am genuinely interested what your issue is with "I.C.E.". you appear to have mentioned it a few times. At the risk of sounding condescending, you do understand it stands for 'Internal Combustion Engine', so I don't see why you seem to reference the term as you do.
I'm not sure what term you would like used in it's place, when referencing Vehicles with Internal Combustion Engines ?
Really ? That's your response as a mature adult.Proper cars?
OK, gloves off. Proper cars eh? Well as we're going all childish, why not...Proper cars?