locking

Tidal locking between a pair of co-orbiting astronomical bodies occurs when one of the objects reaches a state where there is no longer any net change in its rotation rate over the course of a complete orbit. In the case where a tidally locked body possesses synchronous rotation, the object takes just as long to rotate around its own axis as it does to revolve around its partner. For example, the same side of the Moon always faces the Earth, although there is some variability because the Moon's orbit is not perfectly circular. Usually, only the satellite is tidally locked to the larger body. However, if both the difference in mass between the two bodies and the distance between them are relatively small, each may be tidally locked to the other; this is the case for Pluto and Charon, as well as for Eris and Dysnomia. Alternative names for the tidal locking process are gravitational locking, captured rotation, and spin–orbit locking.
The effect arises between two bodies when their gravitational interaction slows a body's rotation until it becomes tidally locked. Over many millions of years, the interaction forces changes to their orbits and rotation rates as a result of energy exchange and heat dissipation. When one of the bodies reaches a state where there is no longer any net change in its rotation rate over the course of a complete orbit, it is said to be tidally locked. The object tends to stay in this state because leaving it would require adding energy back into the system. The object's orbit may migrate over time so as to undo the tidal lock, for example, if a giant planet perturbs the object.
Not every case of tidal locking involves synchronous rotation. With Mercury, for example, this tidally locked planet completes three rotations for every two revolutions around the Sun, a 3:2 spin–orbit resonance. In the special case where an orbit is nearly circular and the body's rotation axis is not significantly tilted, such as the Moon, tidal locking results in the same hemisphere of the revolving object constantly facing its partner.
However, in this case the exact same portion of the body does not always face the partner on all orbits. There can be some shifting due to variations in the locked body's orbital velocity and the inclination of its rotation axis.

View More On Wikipedia.org
  • 3

    MG Clive

    Prominent Member From North Yorkshire
    • Messages
      1,027
    • Reaction score
      1,348
    • Points
      430
  • 2

    YaR

    Established Member From Cambridge
    • Messages
      226
    • Reaction score
      228
    • Points
      92
  • 1

    Deep purple

    Established Member From Milbourne UK
    • Messages
      137
    • Reaction score
      133
    • Points
      55
  • 1

    Ian Key

    Distinguished Member From Derby UK
    • Messages
      4,837
    • Reaction score
      8,628
    • Points
      2,315
  • 1

    naruto128

    Novice Member From Sydney
    • Messages
      1
    • Reaction score
      0
    • Points
      1
  • 1

    ashok198311

    Standard Member From Cheltenham
    • Messages
      47
    • Reaction score
      9
    • Points
      12
  • 1

    Alb

    Moderator From MG5 SR PFL
    • Messages
      4,619
    • Solutions
      7
    • Reaction score
      6,093
    • Points
      1,883
  • 1

    Edward Xuereb

    Standard Member From Malta
    • Messages
      27
    • Reaction score
      17
    • Points
      15
  • 1

    Rossits

    Novice Member From Denham
    • Messages
      3
    • Reaction score
      0
    • Points
      2
  • 1

    SimonS

    Established Member From Ayr, Scotland
    • Messages
      192
    • Solutions
      1
    • Reaction score
      218
    • Points
      84
  • 1

    dave3005

    Established Member From Kent, UK
    • Messages
      65
    • Reaction score
      50
    • Points
      20
  • 1

    wenkatn

    Established Member From Rugby, UK
    • Messages
      51
    • Reaction score
      30
    • Points
      21
  • 1

    Larry North

    Novice Member From Sydney Australia
    • Messages
      11
    • Reaction score
      2
    • Points
      2
  • 1

    SteveRW

    Established Member From Norfolk
    • Messages
      68
    • Reaction score
      88
    • Points
      35
  • 1

    John T

    Standard Member From Staffordshire
    • Messages
      41
    • Reaction score
      34
    • Points
      21
  • 1

    Montego

    Established Member From Basingstoke, UK
    • Messages
      52
    • Reaction score
      59
    • Points
      21
  • 1

    SA McCall

    Novice Member From AIRDRIE
    • Messages
      1
    • Reaction score
      0
    • Points
      1
  • 1

    Eddie A

    Standard Member From Bracknell
    • Messages
      18
    • Reaction score
      25
    • Points
      12
  • 1

    SiW80

    Established Member From Herts
    • Messages
      146
    • Reaction score
      80
    • Points
      48
  • 1

    Gene Highwind

    Standard Member From United Kingdom
    • Messages
      16
    • Reaction score
      26
    • Points
      10
  • Back
    Top Bottom