rjhfandclf
Established Member
- Joined
- Nov 16, 2023
- Messages
- 168
- Reaction score
- 125
- Points
- 50
- Location
- Wilds of E Essex & SW France
- Driving
- MG4 Trophy ER
At long last, this weird late summer/autumn broke into real warm sunshine for a few days and we took Beetlejuice up into the heart of the Pyrenees for a couple of days for her first proper jaunt there … and I am really very impressed at the performance in every way. The Pyrenees are not as high as the Alps perhaps, but very steep in places, and we tested her up the 2115m Col du Tourmalet pass – famous (and sometimes infamous too) as the most emblematic of Tour de France top category climbs. BLJ simply skipped up – and down of course. (Just don’t understand the problem with these cyclists!!)
After the Col we descended, then up again into the central massif to tour around in a circle, with overnight backdrop of the magical Cirque de Gavarnie with its 422m drop waterfall – the 2nd highest in mainland Europe.
Anyway, some rather interesting statistics from the relatively short 243km (151m) trip ... We start from being only 50km (30m) directly north of the mountains, but at only 250m alt, and as we were generally in sightseeing mode, we seldom drove above 80kph and the avge was nearer half of that, so we were hoping to see good consumption rates. We always use max regen and Normal mode (MG recommends Sport for mountains – no idea why). And as @EVsince2016 has already mentioned further above, the regen obtained over these long mountain descents is amazing, and we saw the SOC rise by 4% (+3kW) over the 18km descent from the Col to Luz-Saint-Sauveur (see photo above).:
Day 1: SOC at 100%. 120km in total. First 50km, down then generally flat with only a gentle rise, then increasingly steeper climbing 1865m to the Col at 85km. Then continuously down – up – down etc., right through to the homeward leg next day. SOC at end of first day was 71% so 29% or approx. 21.5kW used = 18kW/100km (3.5m/kW). Very pleased with that in view of all the climbing.
Day 2: SOC at 71%. 123km in total. First 50km, down towards Lourdes was a long continuous meandering descent of sufficient gradient to give us almost continuous regen – quite extraordinary – the first dozen km we were well into negative territory, and by Lourdes, our overall consumption rate was averaging out down to 5kW/100km (12.5m/kW)! And by the time we got home, the final figures registered for Day 2 were 58% SOC, so just 13% used (9.5kW) or 7.9kW/100km (coincidentally also = 7.9m/kW!)
Overall: The 243 km trip returned 31kW (42%) used at 12.75kW/100km or 4.9m/kW (if all my maths are correct!)
After the Col we descended, then up again into the central massif to tour around in a circle, with overnight backdrop of the magical Cirque de Gavarnie with its 422m drop waterfall – the 2nd highest in mainland Europe.
Anyway, some rather interesting statistics from the relatively short 243km (151m) trip ... We start from being only 50km (30m) directly north of the mountains, but at only 250m alt, and as we were generally in sightseeing mode, we seldom drove above 80kph and the avge was nearer half of that, so we were hoping to see good consumption rates. We always use max regen and Normal mode (MG recommends Sport for mountains – no idea why). And as @EVsince2016 has already mentioned further above, the regen obtained over these long mountain descents is amazing, and we saw the SOC rise by 4% (+3kW) over the 18km descent from the Col to Luz-Saint-Sauveur (see photo above).:
Day 1: SOC at 100%. 120km in total. First 50km, down then generally flat with only a gentle rise, then increasingly steeper climbing 1865m to the Col at 85km. Then continuously down – up – down etc., right through to the homeward leg next day. SOC at end of first day was 71% so 29% or approx. 21.5kW used = 18kW/100km (3.5m/kW). Very pleased with that in view of all the climbing.
Day 2: SOC at 71%. 123km in total. First 50km, down towards Lourdes was a long continuous meandering descent of sufficient gradient to give us almost continuous regen – quite extraordinary – the first dozen km we were well into negative territory, and by Lourdes, our overall consumption rate was averaging out down to 5kW/100km (12.5m/kW)! And by the time we got home, the final figures registered for Day 2 were 58% SOC, so just 13% used (9.5kW) or 7.9kW/100km (coincidentally also = 7.9m/kW!)
Overall: The 243 km trip returned 31kW (42%) used at 12.75kW/100km or 4.9m/kW (if all my maths are correct!)