SAIC in trouble? Others are growing, SAIC continues to decline.

[DB Go Rex]

Ok then. Whilst I can't speak for any other particular car of any model or brand, if he had, had my particular car over the past 2 years, it would have been perfectly fine, software / infotainment wise for over those 2 years. Unless the software would have behaved differently just for him.

I think there's so many things to point out that are objectively bad or wrong about the key driver displays, infotainment and the safety systems, I can't agree with 'perfectly fine'. It's just miles off the Korean's for example.

If it's good enough for you, that's fine, but know that others can do this stuff better.

 

[AlexC]

I think there's so many things to point out that are objectively bad or wrong about the key driver displays, infotainment and the safety systems, I can't agree with 'perfectly fine'. It's just miles off the Korean's for example.

If it's good enough for you, that's fine, but know that others can do this stuff better.

Actually it is good enough in terms of functional enough for all users. Objectively, yes UI could be better and certainly faster, more shortcuts and refined behaviour, but plenty good enough. Ultimately it drives well.

 

[Ruislip Resident]

I think there's so many things to point out that are objectively bad or wrong about the key driver displays, infotainment and the safety systems, I can't agree with 'perfectly fine'. It's just miles off the Korean's for example.

If it's good enough for you, that's fine, but know that others can do this stuff better.

Your point wasn't about Chinese v Korean. It was about Jim Farleys view of Fords v Chinese. If he had lived with the specific MG I have driven for 2 years, I don't believe the assessment he made would have changed. Your comment put forward the proposition that it would.

 

[fred12345]

for the money I paid, I'm over the moon.