NLMGSAN
Prominent Member
- Joined
- Dec 26, 2023
- Messages
- 1,246
- Reaction score
- 642
- Points
- 272
- Location
- Ede, NL
- Driving
- MG4 Trophy ER
The thing with these systems is that 'objective studies' do show possitive effects. But those are extrapolated effects to all road users. There is no discussion about the exceptions: when the systems fail. In some case they scare the hell out of you, in very rare cases they might cause casualties. But overall.... the average is what makes the policies tick.
The manufacturers know this. All of them. Look at the manuals and read the chapters about those safety systems. The most important part is about responsibility: it is you. The driver. Next, there will be lists so you know when these systems may not work properly, or when they simply are bound to fail. The latter coincides with a strict advice to disable immediately/asap etc. So if anything happens, you are the moron. After all of this, then they will describe what these system are supposed to do.
This is why any button, how deeply hidden in the systems it may be, will always allow you to disable them. If they take that away, you can no longer be held responsible in general and that is a risk manufacturers will not take.
What we are currently doing is describe events where these systems either blatently fail or intervene with a better response from the driver. They are anecdotical of nature, poorly documented and easily classified as 'subjective and flawed observations', as well as suspect of poor use. On the other side we have goverments, regulatory organisations with an eye on the big numbers (such as NCAP), insurance and car companies (with an eye on big 'numbers' too).
For things to change we first need a number of deaths and a string of law suites. Unless systems drastically improve. Than the issues will fade away.
The manufacturers know this. All of them. Look at the manuals and read the chapters about those safety systems. The most important part is about responsibility: it is you. The driver. Next, there will be lists so you know when these systems may not work properly, or when they simply are bound to fail. The latter coincides with a strict advice to disable immediately/asap etc. So if anything happens, you are the moron. After all of this, then they will describe what these system are supposed to do.
This is why any button, how deeply hidden in the systems it may be, will always allow you to disable them. If they take that away, you can no longer be held responsible in general and that is a risk manufacturers will not take.
What we are currently doing is describe events where these systems either blatently fail or intervene with a better response from the driver. They are anecdotical of nature, poorly documented and easily classified as 'subjective and flawed observations', as well as suspect of poor use. On the other side we have goverments, regulatory organisations with an eye on the big numbers (such as NCAP), insurance and car companies (with an eye on big 'numbers' too).
For things to change we first need a number of deaths and a string of law suites. Unless systems drastically improve. Than the issues will fade away.
Last edited: