Fogey
Established Member
- Joined
- Oct 19, 2022
- Messages
- 117
- Reaction score
- 127
- Points
- 37
- Location
- Southampton, England
- Driving
- Not an MG
Yes - you have to "baby", to some extent, the dual-clutch transmission when in traffic - which is another negative (I'm familiar with that, because I run an auto which is similar in that regard - and it's tedious).In fairness it is only the dual clutch gearboxes that have failed in SOME Ford Focus, Hyundai, VW's and a few other related brands and in many cases it was because owners had no idea how to drive them without burning out clutches. I had a Renault Clio RS 200 (hot hatch) for many years with a dual clutch auto and had no issues with it because you need to drive them like a manual car with an auto option and not allow them to 'creep' in traffic or not allow the transmission to hold the car stopped on a hill but use the brakes in the same way you would preserve the clutch on a manual car.
Also there have been very few dramas with torque converter and CVT trannies over the years in ICE vehicles.
I love the MG4 but time will tell whether the 'transmission' will hold up over time.
And the trouble with torque-converter types - though they can otherwise be very good - is that they're inefficient (and pretty complex, needing precise maintenance). Though the Peugeot/Vauxhall EAT8 is pretty decent. Automated manual 'boxes are OK in some respects, but are nastier to drive than the Dual-clutch types. CVT's are not good to drive either - with sluggish responses - and a record of poor reliability (note: Toyota's misnamed "e-CVT" excepted).
The MG4's simple reduction gearing should be a cause for celebration, and it's turning out just the opposite because of a lousy breather - amplified by MG's seeming reluctance to fix it satisfactorily.
Which is making me have second thoughts about completing the purchase, I have to add.