wattmatters
Established Member
- Joined
- Sep 29, 2023
- Messages
- 678
- Reaction score
- 704
- Points
- 214
- Location
- Bellingen, NSW Australia
- Driving
- MG4 Trophy LR
I don't think we should eschew such discussions.Scientific debate has its place - I just think that this kind of forum isn't that place.
There may well be more suitable places but people are free to not read an on-topic post.
Meanwhile not every post needs to be digestible for every reader. If someone does not understand but wishes to learn, they can always ask. If they are not interested then they can keep on scrolling. If the discussion were off-topic then I would agree with you.
Only have to look at threads on topics such as car connectivity and linking with customised software systems. My eyes glaze over when it comes to IT/connectivity stuff. I still read many of them though, I just might learn something but am not afraid to admit when it's over my head. But I do not begrudge for one moment the fact there are those who do post on such things. And by asking enough questions / seeking guidance I've been able to apply some of the in-depth stuff they've laid out for my own use. I learned something.
You may well be right but why should a discussion be so narrowly defined?The original post asked about the "difference between Eco, normal and sport modes". Did the person asking the question expect an answer involving in-depth technical explanation and debate? Or were they looking for practical advice that they could make use of today? That's impossible for me to say. I suspect it was the latter.
Often great understanding emerges from asking what appears to be a simple question. And as we know, not every simple question has a simple answer. It's OK to recognise that we may not know, or that "it's complicated".
I definitely agree that providing something the lay person can grapple with is helpful but I see no reason to exclude the possibility some may also appreciate a deep dive.