Paulie68
Prominent Member
- Joined
- Aug 22, 2019
- Messages
- 1,096
- Reaction score
- 1,420
- Points
- 432
- Location
- North East Lincolnshire
- Driving
- MG5 Trophy LR
Hi Guys,
Been trying to get to the bottom of this issue and what I am finding is not good.
My EV Buffins are now doing my head in with too much information.
I am becoming worried that MG has made"DOODLES " of us in getting us to buy the MG ZS EV.
I must admit, I just liked the look of the car and how it felt on the test drive. The price and the few details such as range were not the best but I thought were acceptable.
So I bought the ZS EV but now I am becoming aware that there is in fact a lot more that one should look at with EVs, and one of those is the state of the underside.
I do not know whether any of you checked the underside of the ZS EV before buying but I did not. It turns out that for EVs it is very foolish not to have done an underside check.
Did you all know that to achieve the best fuel efficiency, protection and durability the underside of an EV should be completely covered?
Well, do any of you know if any of the manufacturers of EVs are able to achieve near 100% underside cover ? ? ? Tesla in model 3
I am re-checking the information I am getting and when I know that all the information is right/ true, I will share it with you. I must say however that at present I am very worried that if I knew what I know now, then I would not have bought the ZS EV.
I am finding this absolutely disheartening.
I would be grateful if you all double up you efforts to investigate and understand this issue and how we can make the best out of what seems a bad design situation on part of MG.
I was personally fully aware of the underside of the ZS EV when I decided to buy it. I'm probably one of the very few people who will actually get down on the floor and slide about underneath cars in a showroom. (Usually much to the amusement of the staff!) MG appear to have given almost no consideration to aerodynamics under the car and, yes, it would benefit from some appropriately placed plastic cladding to improve this.
However, the range is still perfectly acceptable and efficiency isn't bad at all for the size and shape of the car, so being "absolutely disheartened" seems a bit dramatic!
Long term reliability, durability, & corrosion resistance of the body are things that I do consider important and time will tell how this pans out.
Not so worried that my car could possibly have been 10% more efficient with some strategically placed cladding attached, but if this could help to keep dirt and road debris out of the under bonnet area I'd, of course, prefer it.
Last edited: