BarryH
Established Member
- Joined
- Feb 4, 2021
- Messages
- 643
- Reaction score
- 662
- Points
- 206
- Location
- South Woodham Ferrers, Nr Chelmsford
- Driving
- Not an MG
I can certainly answer your KERS question. No, you can't get the ZS (mk1 or Facelift) to do regenerative braking when on AAC. The motor control system isn't capable of it. However, the MG5 which has a different motor control system from a different supplier/development stream has always had it baked-in from day 1. And of course, the MG4 on the new modular platform has it so all new models released by MG would have it also.I can tell you a funny story about the front camera. Recently I had a fall and when I went to our
local medical centre to be patched up, I hit a bush with my front number plate and cracked the plastic surround. I later glued it up and used an old style large paper clip to hold it in place while it cured. A day or two later I got a warning that the cruise control following and pedestrian avoidance systems weren't working! As it happens I had left the big clip in place and the arms of the clip were blocking the view of the forward camera which is installed directly under and behind the number plate in my ZS. BTW I do NOT remember a forward view display, in fact I have a separate camera mounted on my dash and run off a USB port.
BTW does anyone know of a means of using regenerative braking under cruise control.
My area of NZ has a lot of 80 Km speed limits and the control is useful for this, does seem like
a waste of energy and wear on the brakes without regen though!!
My own car is 94% solar powered as I charge it from a 5 Kw solar roof and at 36 degrees South this
produces quite a lot of energy. I also power the house in daytime and export any surplus power back to the grid (about 300 kW/H last month) Southern summer of course.
Now the good news. I have a ZS and I'm convinced it makes very little difference to the effective range. the reason being is that the types of trips, roads and speeds where ACC is appropriate to be used (straight cruising conditions) wouldn't actually be the trips where you would be varying the speed a lot in any case and therefore not the conditions under which KERS would be recovering a significant amount of energy. The benefit of smoother more consistent progress under ACC control rather than a fluctuating right foot more than makes up for the absence of KERS under ACC driving.
I can offer as evidence a trial I did on a mixed journey of 75 miles each way on which I drove outbound under ACC with MG Pilot at every opportunity in my ZS and homeward without either in operation. Traffic conditions were similar yet I used about 10 miles less of my range according to the depleted expected range on the dash. Maybe not wholly scientific but good enough for me not to be overly concerned by the lack of regenerative braking under ACC on the ZS.